<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web 2.0 without javascript?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webtropic.cc/2009/09/30/web-2-0-without-javascript/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webtropic.cc/2009/09/30/web-2-0-without-javascript/</link>
	<description>The digital lair of Nikos Anagnostou</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 00:19:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fakhrime</title>
		<link>http://webtropic.cc/2009/09/30/web-2-0-without-javascript/#comment-581</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fakhrime]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webtropic.cc/?p=501#comment-581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;And the question is: how can we rely so heavily on a language that is so vulnerable?&quot;

so, i think your post make the javascript being jokescript..xoxo
lol.

@me, js lover]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And the question is: how can we rely so heavily on a language that is so vulnerable?&#8221;</p>
<p>so, i think your post make the javascript being jokescript..xoxo<br />
lol.</p>
<p>@me, js lover</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikos Anagnostou</title>
		<link>http://webtropic.cc/2009/09/30/web-2-0-without-javascript/#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nikos Anagnostou]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 08:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webtropic.cc/?p=501#comment-421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Chris Javascript is a great language with great weaknesses. Web 2.0 (a generic term refering to all the social web sites) is depended on Javascript. I am not saying it won&#039;t be functional under web 2.0. Quite the opposite. Web 2.0 does not work without javascript. This is what I am trying to demonstrate in the post. And the question is: how can we rely so heavily on a language that is so vulnerable?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chris Javascript is a great language with great weaknesses. Web 2.0 (a generic term refering to all the social web sites) is depended on Javascript. I am not saying it won&#8217;t be functional under web 2.0. Quite the opposite. Web 2.0 does not work without javascript. This is what I am trying to demonstrate in the post. And the question is: how can we rely so heavily on a language that is so vulnerable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Papandropoulos</title>
		<link>http://webtropic.cc/2009/09/30/web-2-0-without-javascript/#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Papandropoulos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 08:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webtropic.cc/?p=501#comment-420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I must admit that I like Javascript. I think is a very powerfull language in the web since it helps you perform tasks in a neat and easy way. Are you sure it won&#039;t be functional under WEB 2.0]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must admit that I like Javascript. I think is a very powerfull language in the web since it helps you perform tasks in a neat and easy way. Are you sure it won&#8217;t be functional under WEB 2.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

